Thursday, January 15, 2026
💬 In a few words:
Well, I never! President Trump is stirring the pot in Minnesota again, threatening to send in the military with that old 'Insurrection Act.' It’s a proper hullabaloo over those ICE protests, sweetie.
More details:
The Latest Commotion from the White House!
Oh, sweetie, you won't believe the drama brewing in Washington and out in Minnesota! Our President, Donald J. Trump, has gone and stirred the pot again, threatening to pull out that dusty old 'Insurrection Act'. Can you imagine?
Apparently, there’s been quite the hullabaloo over in Minneapolis. Those ICE agents, bless their hearts, were involved in a shooting that tragically killed a woman, Renee Macklin Good. Then, heavens to Betsy, another Venezuelan immigrant was shot in the leg during an attempted arrest!
Naturally, people are upset, leading to all sorts of protests against ICE. And what does our President do? He hops onto that 'Truth Social' of his and declares that if those 'corrupt politicians' in Minnesota don't get things under control, he'll bring in the big guns. "I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT!" he types, bold as brass.
Minnesota's Attorney General, Keith Ellison, immediately shot back, saying President Trump was the one who started the mess by sending thousands of federal agents there. He's even prepared to challenge it in court! Well, I never!
Grandma's Two Cents: What Are They THINKING?
Honestly, back in my day, if you had a disagreement, you’d sit down over a cup of tea and hash it out! None of this public shouting and threatening to bring in the military. It’s all just so… exhausting.
President Trump talks about "professional agitators" and "insurrectionists." But then, Attorney General Ellison says it's the President himself causing the 'insurrection.' It's enough to make your head spin, dear!
You see, the Insurrection Act means he can send troops to states to restore order, but here's the kicker: these troops can actually perform law enforcement duties, like making arrests! It’s not just a polite request for the National Guard like we saw in 2025. This is serious business, like a bull in a china shop.
It makes you wonder, doesn't it? Are things really so bad that we need to dust off laws from Thomas Jefferson’s time? He signed it into law back in 1807, a lifetime ago!
What Actually Happened (The Nitty-Gritty, My Dearest)
Now, let's get down to brass tacks about this 'Insurrection Act.' It's a pretty powerful tool, allowing the President to deploy the military without a state's consent under certain conditions. There are three main ways he can do it:
- If a state’s legislature or governor asks for help during an “insurrection.”
- If “unlawful obstructions” make it “impracticable” to enforce federal laws.
- If an insurrection “hinders” or “obstructs” federal laws or “impedes justice.”
Before he can even think about it, he has to tell the "insurgents" to disperse first. It's not just a snap of the fingers, you see.
This act is quite different from those National Guard deployments you hear about. Usually, there's a law called the Posse Comitatus Act that stops federal military from acting like police. But the Insurrection Act? Oh, that’s the big exception!
It's only been used about 30 times since it was created, and the last time was way back in the 1992 Los Angeles riots. President George H.W. Bush used it then, at the request of the governor. They even had a little mix-up where Marines almost started shooting when police just wanted them to 'cover' them. Goodness me, that's what happens when you mix soldiers and policemen!
Our President, bless his heart, has claimed that nearly half of all U.S. presidents have used it. And that one president used it 28 times! Well, I did a little digging – and the good folks at the Brennan Center for Justice say only 17 out of 45 presidents (37%) have ever used it. And no one more than six times! Oh, that Trump, always exaggerating!
"It's incredibly open-ended and grants him a dramatic amount of discretion to federalize an incident." — William Banks, Professor Emeritus of Law, Syracuse University.
Legal experts are worried, dear, because terms like "insurrection" are so vague. It gives the President a whole lot of power, and it doesn't even need Congress’s say-so! But they also say it's not a blank check and would likely face legal challenges if used just for crime or immigration enforcement.
Why Grandma Just Can't Even Today…
Honestly, sweetie, sometimes I just want to sit down with a nice cup of chamomile tea and not hear another peep about these big, scary acts and protests. All this talk of invoking old laws and sending in troops, it’s enough to give a gal the vapors!
Why can't everyone just be a little more sensible? It feels like we're always on the brink of something, and it makes a grandmother worry. I just hope everyone stays safe and that cooler heads prevail. What a world, what a world!
Grandma's waiting on your verdict
Pour dear Grandma another cup by tapping how this gossip feels. She can't finish her knitting until you whisper your take.